|
Student and Therapist Newsletter Archive + Do I use somato emotional release? - June 07 + Talking during treatment. - January 07 Dear John, So this is me participating
by asking a question. I notice that you haven't talked about somato emotional
release in any of your newsletters. I am wondering if you use it and what
you think >>>MY COMMENTS: I have received a number of emails asking me about
somato emotional release and one asking about its lesser known culinary
equivalent, Tomato So I will combine your answer with the others. I don't use somato emotional release perse. What I use is a technique I developed called therapeutic inquiry. My own cranio sacral training was somewhat osteopathic in approach and didn't really encourage talking with the patient during treatment. I felt this ignored a whole spectrum of possible information. I studied a couple of different talking approaches,
including somato emotional release but found that none of them covered
everything that When it came time to teach this technique I called it therapeutic inquiry because the essence of what I was doing involved asking the patient the right questions, at the right time and in the right way. Not everyone needs to verbalise what they are experiencing
when they are releasing a deep trauma but if they do then you need to
know very clearly Knowing the difference between who needs to talk and who doesn't is all part of the skill. At other times you will have a sense that someone is on the verge of releasing something and it is one of those releases that needs to come through the person's consciousness. The patient needs to verbalise it but it just won't come, again this is where therapeutic inquiry comes in. Therapeutic inquiry is used to help a particular kind
of restriction to release. As you know, in the course of treatment we
use different techniques for different kinds of restrictions, some require
direct technique, some require indirect, some require remote work using
intention away from the site of restriction while others require close
work. To explain why you would need to use therapeutic inquiry,
I need to talk a little bit about how these kinds of restrictions are
formed. A child finds itself in a situation it can't cope
with. From the child's perspective the situation is threatening to its
survival. The child needs to process the situation very fast and arrive
at a solution that will insure its survival. The child quickly reviews
its part in the circumstances that have led to the current situation.
Instinct? If we hear a sudden loud noise our bodies will have
an instinctive protective reaction. Without thinking, our body interprets
the noise as potentially dangerous and reacts to protect itself. In these
circumstances we are operating from our instinct. Back to our child. Time passes and the child grows
into an adult. The difficult situation has passed but the embellished
instinct does not change, it stays in place doing its job. Because it
doesn't adapt with the growth of the Not clear enough? Okay here's an example. A young boy pulls a chair over to the stove to investigate
the strange wispy cloudy stuff coming from a pot. The boy can see she is very upset. In an instant the boy decides the following, which I will explain in adult language.
The above conclusion is reached within minutes of
being slapped. The boy includes the new information in his instinct and
gets on with his life. Fortunately he goes to a cranio sacral therapist for
help. Therapeutic inquiry allows the patient to get in contact with the embellished part of their instinct and begin to communicate with it. All going well this dialogue will lead to changing the directive. I have found that a restriction will only change its function by a direct command from the person. Even then it can be reluctant to accept that authority. The command from the person has to be with the same emotional intensity with which the restriction was first imprinted, because the restriction was charged with the job of protecting the person against mortal danger. Restrictions are reluctant to return the authority if the person is half hearted. They are understandably cautious because of the life & death imperative with which they were programmed. The difficult part of therapeutic inquiry is in easing this instinctive defensiveness. Therapeutic inquiry is a difficult technique to become competent in because it requires you to do all the difficult work you are already doing with your hands and presence AND include this very precise line of questioning. Just to give you a little window into the technical difficulty involved, there is a huge difference between asking, 'How do you feel?' and 'Are you afraid?' The first question suggests the idea of fear and in a nanosecond the patient will be thinking. 'Why are they asking me this? Is there something I should be afraid of?' Asking the patient how they feel allows them to tell you the way they are experiencing the situation; not the way you think they are. It is very important to get it right because you are engaging with a very powerful part of the person and you don't want to be messing around in there. Therapeutic inquiry is the one technique that, far and above all the others, I found students had most difficulty becoming competent in. I devoted a whole trimester of the diploma I used to teach to this technique. As with every 'technique' it is something that needs
to be mastered and integrated. In practice I rarely use isolated techniques
and this includes From the first phone call from a new patient to everything I say to them and everything they say to me. It is all significant and part of the blend of treatment. Dear John, >>>MY COMMENTS: Okey dokey. Here's something you can do. It is a good introduction for other forms of therapeutic conversation which you may intend to use in future treatment sessions with the person. |
|
![]() Copyright John Dalton 2007 Top |

